Overtone Music Network

a common space & database for harmonic overtones

Optimal Overtone Numbering System

Information

Optimal Overtone Numbering System

Let us discuss which overtone numbering system would be the best to agree on. Which numbering system for overtones would You recommend to become an international "ISO-standard" ?

Members: 26
Latest Activity: Jan 15, 2016

Existing systems

1. This I would call "Scientific system" because it comes from Physics. Overtone Analyzer (OA) uses it. Each number means "the number of times the frequency is higher than the base freq.". So, the 1st "overtone" is actually the fundamental tone, because it is "one times the base". We probably all know this physics of overtones.
Pros:
a) Computer programm OA uses it and some composers too.
b) Every octave (from fundamental) is seen on the first sight, because TWO times anything = anything just octave higher. Octaves from fundamental: 2, 4, 8, 16. Also octaves between overtones are obvious, for example: 3, 6 , 12 (perfect fifths) or 5, 10, 20 (major thirds).

Cons:
a) Not so "friendly" for Musicians to learn and to read them. I can see in those numbers the intervals - fifths and thirds etc... on first sight because I was no musician when I have learned them. But I know other people having problems during learning it comming from interchanging (perfetc) fifth with 5th overtone, sixth with 6th overtone etc... But we still have some that are "the same" in interval: 7th overtone = (minor) seventh, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12th ovt.have pretty much the same interval as their numbers are.


2. This I would call "Basic System" (or "Emergency System" - this would be good if we would have no other to choose from. Thats why I call it also "Emergency System").
The numbers are nearly the same (like "Scientific Sys.") BUT they are shifted by one. 1st overtone starts with first "real overtone / higher tone" which means one octave higher from fundamental. So, 1st is 2nd(in Sci.S.), 2nd = 3rd (Sci.S.), 3rd ovt. = 4th ovt.(Sci.S.) etc...
I have first met with it in Czech Republic. One well know professor and university teacher (and ethno-musicologist) used it in reply to my message with composition (so we did misunderstood each other about which ovt.is which). Second time I have seen it (short time ago) used by one singer from this OM-Network ;) . This alarmed me, because of that misunderstanding experience from the past:
Thats why I have created this discussion. To help to prevent those "possible conflicts between Ovt.numbering systems" in the future.


If anyone finds another system, please post it here so we can discuss it.
Also we can create a NEW system, which would combine PROS of all available systems ;)
We will see.
Let the discussion begin.

Discussion Forum

Let's discover Optimal notation syst. for musicians 19 Replies

Started by Filip Rydlo. Last reply by Skye Løfvander Sep 5, 2011.

My opinion about 4 Replies

Started by Marco Tonini. Last reply by Christopher Oct 10, 2010.

Overtones vs. harmonics 4 Replies

Started by Dave Seidel. Last reply by Dave Seidel Jul 22, 2008.

What is your favourite numbering system? 1 Reply

Started by Filip Rydlo. Last reply by Filip Rydlo Jul 22, 2008.

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of OMN to add comments. Sign up, it's free!

Comment by Jan Heinke on July 30, 2008 at 5:48am
hi peter,
thanks, you've touched an interesting topic:

"I know that in cents step 13 of the overtone scale is a bit closer to aflat - but the ear wants a, when you play it on guitar or piano.."

yes, we all are following our expectation while listening to music or nature. that's why we can hear the harmonics 11 and 13 (and some more prime numbers) as major or minor intervals depending on different contexts.
singing a natural 7th (=7th harmonic=970 ct) to a well-temperated piano (=1000ct) sounds really discord but the dominant 7th chord is in both versions (harmonically and chromatically) one of the most recognizable vertical structures in music.
just sing the ode of joy-melody with overtones on a single constant pitch and you will notice an (almost) perfect fourth despite the 11th harmonic is nearly 550 ct, means exactly the middle between the temperated fourth and tritone. sing 10, 11 and 15 and you will listen the same interval as lydian! #11....
and so on for the 13th harmonic=840ct (use 12th/13th/14th/16th harmonic so it sounds major, with 12th/13th/15th/16th it's a minor sixth)
a selection/combination of limited harmonics or a wellknown melody leads to expectations whose influences our perception. what we are listening depends on actual circumstances.
of course we are able to notice these abberations with a little practise. anyway, it seems to be a precious tool or trick to realise a more complex music.
best, jan
Comment by Filip Rydlo on July 26, 2008 at 7:06pm
Thank Thee for Thy comment, Bayreuther.
Comment by Peter Bayreuther on July 22, 2008 at 8:06pm
I am very much for the "scientific" system numbering the fundamental as 1.
I would call it step 1 of the overtone scale.
In every scale you have two things: STEPS and INTERVALLS
so in the normal C scale the first step is C and the first Intervall is from C to D which is a second...
As a Jazz musician I anyway think in chords and scales - so the overtones on C up to step 12 of the overtone scale would be:
C 7/9/#11 as chord and
c g c e g b cdef#g as scale
lately I like to use this scale on guitar and violin in the exact structure saying internally:
fundamental fith fundamental third fifth seventh fundamental ninth third sharp eleven fifth...

up to step 16 of overtone scale
C7/9/#11/13/j7
as scale
c g c e g b cdef#gabhc
I know that in cents step 13 of the overtone scale is a bit closer to aflat - but the ear wants a, when you play it on guitar or piano..
internally I see c with fifth, then C7 chord, then lydian scale on C with added bflat (minor seven).

So I am very much in favor of saying step 1 ( 2 3 4etc.) of the overtone scale - step 1 certainly being the fundamental C ( or other tone ) like we do it with other scales too.
On the other hand the traditional intervall names should be known, because they give you a feeling how leaps do sound and make clear the harmonc nature of the overtone scale, strongly based on the C7 chord( or other fundamental) , which is used with such joy by intuitive blues musicians...

best greetings

Peter
Comment by Filip Rydlo on July 22, 2008 at 7:11pm
Some people are just having difficulties while learning them: because of messing up ovt.numbers with intervals. That's all.
e.g. third, fourth, fifth, sixth ...
Comment by Bodo Maass on July 22, 2008 at 10:55am
I made a mistake in my last post, too bad this site doesn't let you edit or preview posts. In the alternative numbering starting with 0, the octaves would be on 0,1,3,7 etc.
Here is the perfect fifth again, but this time with fundamental=0, first overtone=1:

As in the previous image, the red lines are the octaves, and the green lines are those that match between the two sliders.
Comment by Bodo Maass on July 22, 2008 at 9:42am
Hi Filip,

I had this discussion with Wolfgang when we started the work on Overtone Analyzer. He convinced me that what you call the 'scientific' system is the best, and I agree.
Here you can see two tones forming a perfect fifth:


As Marco and Jan have pointed out, numbering the fundamental as 1 is just the most intuitive system that I can think of, because every harmonic frequency is a whole multiple of the fundamental.

So, as in the picture:
1 = 220Hz 1th Harmonic, Fundamental
2 = 440Hz 2nd Harmonic, 1th Overtone
3 = 660Hz 3rd Harmonic
etc.

I guess as a musician you wouldn't think about the frequency numbers, but as in Marco's reply, I still value that the octaves are all on powers of 2: 1, 2, 4, 8, etc.
On the other system, they would be on 2,3,5,9 etc, and you can no longer double the number to go to the next octave.
In conclusion, I think the 'scientific system' has a lot of merit.

Could you perhaps explain more about what you find wrong with this system, and why people have difficulty with it?
Comment by Jan Heinke on July 22, 2008 at 6:28am
hi filip and friends,
nice to find this theme. yes, i also prefer to count in harmonics, means the fundamental is 1. (to separate fundamental and overtones seems to be an historical mistake and leads to unexplainable difficulties. imagine any polyhedron, call one of the x angles 0 and try to do something usefully with it.) all the mathematical relations between numbers/geometrical forms resp. frequencies are represented by audible properties. not only for tones but for rhythms to. nobody would call the first beat in a bar 0. polyrhytmical patterns are functionally adequate to musical intervalls (1/2, 2/3, 3/4...). in this point of view we have a mathematical explanation why we prefer these intervalls and rhythms in the music we do. (in other words we have a distinct sense for abstract regularities very closed to our inner feelings.)

our diatonic scale with 7 tones is based on the harmonic scale but on another level of complexity. thats why we have different numbers for the same intervall ( perfect fifth=3th harmonic, major third=5th...) it only seems contradictory. a diatonic second is represented by the proportion 8/9 or 9/10. the same intervall is included in the harmonic scale. (fundamental=1=C, then you have these second between c and d = 8th and 9th harmonic resp. d and e = 9th and 10th harmonic and so on and vice versa. to handle these definitions is little effort in view of the beauty behind the numbers. with a few rules (running on different levels of complexity) is it possible to create remarkable colours and movements. ...to find these rules we need useful definitions. (but it's obviously impossible to CREATE harmonical systems. we allways unearth very old bones.)
best wishes
jan
Comment by Filip Rydlo on July 22, 2008 at 1:48am
Welcome friends!

The picture of the group is actually a small part of Gayatri Mantra displayed in "Rainbow" colormap on Overtone Analyzer. ;)
 

Members (24)

 
 
 

Sponsored by:

Latest Activity

Aionigma posted a photo
20 minutes ago
Cora Krötz commented on Cora Krötz's video
1 hour ago
Cora Krötz posted a video

Chasing Cars - WIR4 a cappella mit Hang zu Obertönen

Mehr Infos und Konzerttermine unter http://www.wir4acappella.de More infos and audio examples: http://www.wir4acappella.de Recording und Film-Produktion: Ste...
1 hour ago
Giovanni Bortoluzzi updated their profile
yesterday
Benedict Slotte posted a video

Proportiones Absconditae - a musical-graphical artwork exploring ratios in geometry and music

Video version of artwork exhibited at the Olohuone 306.4 km2 city art festival in Turku, Finland, June 2019. The artwork explores analogies between geometric...
Sep 10
Stuart Hinds posted a status
Sep 7
Andreas Eder posted a video

Gloria

Gloria in excelsis deo et in terra pax hominibus. Fassung von Iver Livendahl, eingespielt mit Orgel und Obertongesang im August 2019. Das Original war 2011 i...
Sep 6
Mikuskovics Baum updated their profile
Sep 1

© 2007 - 2019   Impressum - Privacy Policy - Sponsored by Yoga Vidya, Germany -   Powered by

 |  Support | Privacy  |  Terms of Service